Merrick Garland Says Yes to Gun Control: What to Do

February 23, 2021
3 min read
Share this post
Gun owner with dog and young child

Merrick Garland expected to advance fun control policies

As the topic of gun control becomes more and more of a hot-button issue, we’re now seeing signs that additional restrictions may be en route.

On Monday, February 22, Merrick Garland, a federal appeals court judge who is expected to be confirmed as Attorney General, told senators at his confirmation hearing that it’s his job to pursue gun control since Biden is a strong supporter of it. The way he sees it: As long as the Biden administration policies are consistent with the law, he is willing to advance them. Case closed. He said this in response to GOP Sen. Mike Lee’s question of whether or not he is in support of banning certain types of firearms.

What does gun control really mean?

In recent years, the debate of gun control has escalated more and more with the rise of mass shootings. What does gun control mean, anyway? To put it simply: More restrictions on gun sales.By restricting access to guns, supporters like Biden believe many lives will be saved. Opponents argue that restriction goes against the Constitution and believe it will do more harm than good.

Last week, Biden called on Congress to put background checks in place for guns, assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, and remove protection for gun manufacturers who knowingly distribute “weapons of war” in our country.The true definition of an assault weapon is up for debate, but many Democrats consider the AR-15 style semi-automatic rifles, and similar firearms, to be assault rifles. While the gun is used by many gun-rights advocates for self-defense, it has also been a common weapon of choice for mass shootings.

What now?

Garland is expected to be confirmed, but this wasn’t the first time he has been the pick for AG. He was nominated initially in 2016 by President Barack Obama, but Republicans who controlled the Senate in those days declined to hold confirmation hearings.Back in 2007, as a federal appeals judge, Garland voted in favor of gun rights in a case ultimately known as District of Colombia v. Heller. This case was not reheard in the appeals court, and ultimately in 2008, the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects the right for individuals to own guns.Garland clarifies that he voted in favor of gun rights because there was a need for further analysis in this particular case.

What does this mean for gun owners?

Gun-rights advocates can expect new laws and restrictions that could keep certain types of firearms out of citizens’ hands. This could potentially affect new gun sales as well as delegalize guns that are currently protected for private owners. Gun owners will certainly want to pay attention to upcoming weapon laws and are encouraged to speak with their attorney if new legislation is passed.

Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. d/b/a LegalShield (“LegalShield”) provides access to legal services offered by a network of provider law firms to LegalShield members through membership-based participation. Neither LegalShield nor its officers, employees or sales associates directly or indirectly provide legal services, representation or advice. This is meant to provide general information and is not intended to provide legal advice, render an opinion, or provide any specific recommendations. If you are a LegalShield member, please contact your provider law firm for legal advice or assistance.

No items found.

LegalShield is a trademark of Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. (“LegalShield”). LegalShield provides this blog as a public service and for general information only. The information made available in this blog is meant to provide general information and is not intended to provide legal advice, render an opinion, or provide a recommendation as to a specific matter. The blog post is not a substitute for competent legal counsel from a licensed professional lawyer in the state or province where your legal issues exist, and you should seek legal counsel for your specific legal matter. All information by authors is accepted in good faith. However, LegalShield makes no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability, or completeness of such information. The materials contained herein are not regularly updated and may not reflect the most current legal information. No person should either act or refrain from acting on the basis of anything contained on this website. Nothing on this blog is meant to, or does, create an attorney-client relationship with any reader or user. An attorney-client relationship may be formed only after the execution of an engagement letter with an attorney and after that attorney has confirmed that no conflicts of interest exist. Nothing on this website, or information contained or transmitted by this website, is intended to be an advertisement or solicitation. Information contained in the blog may be provided by authors who could be a third-party paid contributor. LegalShield provides access to legal services offered by a network of provider law firms to LegalShield members through membership-based participation. LegalShield is not a law firm, and its officers, employees or sales associates do not directly or indirectly provide legal services, representation, or advice.